Goldidox Strikes Out In Court: Chapter 2
From Twitter Wars to Courtroom Drama: The Escalation and Fallout of Rebecca Hindman's Actions
After a month of relative quiet following the Twitter wars of the previous month, I heard about the SCV Antifa Twitter account posting one of the most extreme images I have ever seen in Santa Clarita's political history.
August 4 - August 9, 2023: I will summarize this area as it covers most of these events here. I was still keeping an eye on SCV Antifa and saw them post a very clear terrorist threat; LASD Deputy Salazar, under oath, confirmed that this image was a clear terrorist threat. So the question I have for LASD is why didn’t they get the FBI or use their subpoena power to unmask the individuals who made this threat? Why was I the one they were looking at when all I did was repost/retweet the image, tagging Hart district and Saugus High School? Why would Hart allow an extremist like Hindman to be on our school campuses? Are we waiting for another Saugus Shooting to take place before the Hart District and Los Angeles Sheriff’s Office take the rise in violent rhetoric seriously? I don’t want to hear the Sheriff throw out the old chestnut "if you see something, say something," because you guys come after the people who say something and ignore what was seen. The fact remains that there is a mentally ill leftist out there who has this gun and a thirst for blood, and it seems like our station can't be bothered to make contact with these individuals.
“He was On Our Radar.”
~FBI (After Every Shooting)
Rick and Rebecca Hindman would go to the next Hart Board meeting and flat-out lie and defame me, claiming that this substack threatened the district with a gun; both of these clips were played in court and admitted into evidence. Hindman would go on to fight Martha Aguilera about me after the meeting; Goldidox kept trying to say that the fight wasn’t about me, and the court disagreed. The Hindmans then apparently enlisted the help of Saugus High School Principal Genevieve Peterson Henry to help gaslight the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department to frame me, the guy warning people of the terrorist threat instead of the terrorist threat itself. Hindman either posted this image herself or knows who did. It's important to note that I submitted a public records request to the Hart District to resolve this situation. However, the Hart District refused to fulfill the request and instead sent their lawyer at me to avoid exposing their actions. Still, somehow, Rebecca Hindman has the email thread from Principal Henry and can enter parts of the email thread into discovery on what planet is that remotely ethical? Hart has a principal who is helping a person who declares themselves a proud terrorist with clear ties to a terrorist organization, and they are worried about the guy trying to give them a heads-up about it. Not a good look for anyone at the Hart District.
“I find it curious that Hindman would file a false police report claiming she was threatened from that retweet and then would leave it off this court filing. Doesn’t even mention it; why hide this information from the court?”
~Excerpt From My First Court Response
By intentionally omitting any mention of the gun retweet, Goldidox made it clear that She didn’t want these SCV Antifa connections on the public record; she probably should have thought about that before filing that bogus restraining order. Pointing that out was the first thing I did in my responses to the petition.
August - October 2023: Hindman would continue to check in with the LASD and expect them to come and arrest me for something; who knows? Her RiseUpSCV accounts are walking contradictions that jump back and forth from being ACAB (All Cops Are Bastards) and constantly criticizing law enforcement for “not doing their job” because they don’t arrest her political adversaries. On October 11, my better half texted me to say there were 2 Sheriff’s deputies looking for someone with my last name, but the first name was wrong, so she told them no one lives there with that name. Later that day, I got a voicemail from Deputy Salazar, which I immediately returned; his call and it took me about 7 minutes to straighten everything out; they were under the impression that Goldidox was a School Board Member, which is why, during court, she kept making the claim that there was a threat against a school board member which was utterly false! It is no wonder they were confused between Hindman’s frantic insistence and inability, to tell the truth. Sometime over the next few weeks, Hindman would check in with Deputy Salazar and find out they would not do anything because there was nothing to do. So, after months of harassing the Sheriff over her bogus police report, she got the bright idea to file this bogus restraining order. 🙄
November - Dec 2023: Hindman retained a lawyer who let her act like a complete fool with all the utter nonsense they would send in discovery. He filed this restraining order with the court on November 14 and then waited until the ninth hour to serve it; the service clerk said this was the dumbest thing he had ever had to serve and that there was zero chance this would get issued. I would drop everything and file an 84-page response that would obliterate her silly claims and have them ask for a continuation, which was granted. It should be noted that both SCV Antifa Twitter accounts (there was also a backup account) just so happened to disappear right before the restraining order was filed. Not suspicious at all.
Here are some of the insane things Hindman sent to me in discovery
Every Twitter screenshot about half a dozen times, in color, in black and white, and with the color inversed along with the screenshot’s metadata because why not?
Random Conversations on Facebook that I wasn’t even party to.
A bank statement showing she paid for Wix.com; why? because Goldidox, that’s why.
Printouts of this Substack: I guess she was flexing that she can operate a web browser and has a printer?
Printouts of the doxing page on Wikipedia. Oh, and here’s a gem: under reasons for doxing on this page, it says "vigilante aid to law enforcement," which, coincidentally, was her exact excuse for breaking the law. Classic, right?
Renee Mckellar’s sockpuppet fighting with another anonymous account that she thought was me; it wasn’t. I don’t have time or the desire to fight an Uber driver who lives with their mom and spends all their time flinging fecal matter on social media.
Back-to-back inverted color pictures of some sign someone made saying she doxed a high schooler; she doxed way more than a high school kid. Props to whoever made that sign.
There was some bizarre exchange between Shannon Gerson and SCV Antifa. She says that Rebecca said SCV Antifa could be trusted and then goes on to claim I am a “scary guy.” but the account that posts the terrorist threat is apparently “a great community.” Then she tells them, Thoughts and prayers, You ok Shannon?
It was both annoying and amusing simultaneously; I almost sent back a bunch of random printed-out Yelp reviews because that would have been more relevant than what I was being sent. If this is Hindman with a Lawyer, can you imagine her going solo at anything legal? “Wait I can’t just gaslight the court with all my crazy claims?” ~Hindman (probably)
January - May 2023: There were approximately six court dates throughout the process. Most of the time, Hindman’s lawyer would request a continuance. Finally, in April, we went through the questioning. Hundreds of pages of discovery were reduced to three key points. The first was a screenshot of a disrespectful tweet that led to his aggressive response, questioning my use of political speech. I calmly responded, “That's how free speech works, bro." He then put the Gun retweet up, which only allowed me to explain to the court what was happening; her lawyer clearly didn’t understand how Twitter worked. He also kept referring to Mario Presents as a “gay site,” and I kept correcting him several times.
He then tried to put up a fake written statement from Renee Mckellar. I am not sure what it said because it was never disclosed in discovery; it is not damning evidence like printouts from Wikipedia, but based on his lead-up questions, it was made up, and they knew that thus why they didn’t disclose it in discovery. The court shut it right down right away. The funny thing is Mckellar was also attempting a bogus restraining order on another person in the community. The only problem was it was the same judge, and she would have known Mckellar had already tried a stunt in her courtroom, so she was a no-show to her own restraining order petition hearing.
His questioning of Hindman mainly was just for emotional appeal, claiming she was afraid. Hindman’s lawyer even got confused when questioning her on the Guido tweet when he claimed I sent a screen from a map; nope, that was your client, pal. Tell the court you didn’t look at the discovery without telling the court you didn’t look at the discovery. Rick Hindman was called to the stand for some unknown reason. Her Lawyer was done relatively quickly. Clearly, his strategy was to be aggressive and hope that I would fight him so he could trip me up; let’s just say he failed bigly.
This is how it felt walking up to question Hindman under oath.
Finally, the moment I had been waiting for had come: questioning Rebecca Hindman under penalty of perjury! I had seven pages of potential lines of questions to ask, and her lawyer would repeatedly object, and almost all of them were overruled. I think he won one of his objections, but other than that, I won the vast majority. He would shift and jerk his body around in his chair upset that he had to sit there while his client got destroyed. Hindman and her lawyer would try to talk to each other during her questioning, and the judge had to intervene, warning them that if it happened again, she would go on the stand. When she admitted to being Rise Up SCV, her lawyer’s head whipped around so fast he must have given himself whiplash. That led to questions about her doxing activities, which I needed to explain to the court. The lawyer objected that it wasn’t relevant but was overruled by the judge, who said it is relevant if she is engaging in the same behavior she is complaining about. Hindman would give her vigilante aid to law enforcement justification, which wouldn’t suddenly make it legal. Another good line of questioning was when she said the fight she picked with Martha Aguilera was not about me. Eventually, the judge would step in and agree that the fight was about me and she was just playing semantics. We would go to the bell and need to come back again because I questioned her that long.
May 24, 2024: This would probably be my only real misstep as I put a lot of effort into a PowerPoint to lay out everything when I should have just focused on my closing statement. I did get to show a few videos of the Hindmans lying at the Hart Board that were put into evidence. I was a little frustrated that I didn’t get to show more, but I think the Judge had already made up her mind. I would rest and then ask if I could read my statement; her lawyer would continually interrupt and object, which only annoyed the judge. She kept telling him he couldn’t object to my testimony. The lawyer wanted to ask me more questions, to which the Judge said no, I am ruling. I am paraphrasing here that the judge noted that Hindman failed to reach the burden of proof required to issue a restraining order that any decent person should find the gun imagery disturbing and that what I did was reasonable. The case was dismissed with prejudice, which is court speak for don’t bring this nonsense back into my court again.
Hindman’s jaw dropped, and her head whipped around to look at Rick Hindman. Her lawyer then got into a back-and-forth with the judge about not being allowed to question me more. And that is how a guy with one law class and a few friends took down a lawyer with nearly 40 years of experience. I really hope this is the last time I have to write about the Hindmans, but who knows? This woman is ideologically captured and doesn’t know how to stop digging when she finds herself in a hole. I was really shocked that we went the distance on this, but she was determined to completely discredit herself. I was more or less done writing about her last August; what more was to be said after her meltdown and trying to fight another parent? It should have been clear who the good guys and bad guys were in this after that.
Be sure to subscribe to stay current on the latest from Accountable SCV and consider supporting through a paid subscription.
Tip: For the optimal reading experience, I suggest downloading the Substack App, which features a convenient function for listening to substacks in a natural-sounding voice.