Despite claims of promoting diversity of thought, recent events at College of the Canyons suggest that Academia may have a preferred set of viewpoints. This article examines the controversy surrounding Angela Davis' speech and questions the current state of higher learning. Read on to learn more.
The idea is to promote a diversity of skin colors and genders who all obey the core condition of adhering to a ridiculous and rigid narrative.
You might see brown as well as white, fat as well as thin, and hideous as well as hot, though hot wokesters are always scammers. But only if the core condition of demented groupthink is met.
A grim and toxic way to live. People who oppose them don't oppose diversity, they oppose theft and degeneracy and the politics of resentment and sleaze.
Free Speech is important for all Americans. Trying to stop a noted academic from speaking is reprehensible. Children need to understand the values we Americans hold dear, like the Bill of Rights.
You completely made that up, making you a liar, a moron, or both, although you're even more likely to be a bot.
But let's pretend you have a functioning brain. What, in your mind, qualifies this babbling, possibly mentally challenged person as a "noted academic"?
(And, while I may be salty, if you're truly a free-speech type, you'll roundly support my refusal to censor myself when confronted with people as morbid as you and statements as ridiculous as yours.)
The idea is to promote a diversity of skin colors and genders who all obey the core condition of adhering to a ridiculous and rigid narrative.
You might see brown as well as white, fat as well as thin, and hideous as well as hot, though hot wokesters are always scammers. But only if the core condition of demented groupthink is met.
A grim and toxic way to live. People who oppose them don't oppose diversity, they oppose theft and degeneracy and the politics of resentment and sleaze.
The virtue signal is weak with this one 😆 All of this pageantry only helps soulless people willing to sellout.
Free Speech is important for all Americans. Trying to stop a noted academic from speaking is reprehensible. Children need to understand the values we Americans hold dear, like the Bill of Rights.
Who tried to stop a “noted academic” from speaking? Also You spelled "Squirrel Nut Bag" wrong Shannon.
You completely made that up, making you a liar, a moron, or both, although you're even more likely to be a bot.
But let's pretend you have a functioning brain. What, in your mind, qualifies this babbling, possibly mentally challenged person as a "noted academic"?
(And, while I may be salty, if you're truly a free-speech type, you'll roundly support my refusal to censor myself when confronted with people as morbid as you and statements as ridiculous as yours.)